Re: Abortion - Senate Bill 1878
I also, um, posted a comment on the Oklahoman article. Yeah, yeah, this is a slippery slope, commenting on articles at newspaper websites. I promise not to get into a flamewar with the stupid trolls who will inevitably show up. Anyway, the article says this:
Uh-huh. The first part is so conservatively biased it's ridiculous. The second part is blatantly untrue. So this is my comment (with better formatting, because their comment posting system sucks):
Governor Henry,
As an Oklahoma woman, I want to urge you to veto Senate Bill 1878. This bill would require a woman to have an ultrasound before being allowed to abort a pregnancy. Proponents of the bill claim this measure will ensure that a woman's consent to an abortion is voluntary, presumably by giving her a visual reminder that, should she continue the pregnancy, the fetus she is carrying will one day be a baby.
Governor Henry, the women of Oklahoma are not children. When we seek abortions, we know what we are doing. Many women who seek abortions are in difficult places in their lives, faced with an even more difficult choice. Perhaps she already has other children and cannot afford to support another. Perhaps she has no medical insurance and cannot afford the pregnancy. Perhaps having a baby at that time in her life will destroy her chances of getting an education or keeping her job. Perhaps the pregnancy is a result of rape, or incest, or an abusive relationship. Women faced with such a difficult choice should not be forced to view an ultrasound in a misplaced attempt to make them feel guilty for seeking an abortion.
Reducing the number of abortions is a noble goal, but Senate Bill 1878 is not the way to achieve it. Measures such as comprehensive sex education in schools, universal health care, paid leave during pregnancy, affordable child care, and domestic violence prevention/assistance would go a long way toward reducing the need for abortion. Senate Bill 1878 will do nothing but demean women by implying we are too stupid to know what abortion is. We know. And we know what we need: your support, not your condemnation.
Thank you for your consideration,
[layniek]
I also, um, posted a comment on the Oklahoman article. Yeah, yeah, this is a slippery slope, commenting on articles at newspaper websites. I promise not to get into a flamewar with the stupid trolls who will inevitably show up. Anyway, the article says this:
KEY PROVISIONS
[...]
Ensures mother's consent to an abortion is voluntary.
Provides a woman with an ultrasound of unborn child that she can view before the abortion.
Uh-huh. The first part is so conservatively biased it's ridiculous. The second part is blatantly untrue. So this is my comment (with better formatting, because their comment posting system sucks):
"KEY PROVISIONS
[...]
"Ensures mother's consent to an abortion is voluntary BY TRYING TO GUILT HER OUT OF HAVING THE ABORTION IN THE FIRST PLACE.
"REQUIRES a woman TO HAVE an ultrasound of THE FETUS that she MUST view before the abortion."
There. Fixed that for you.
location: Initech University
mood:
angry
angryread 11 comments | comment